Intestinal permeability: the cellobiose/mannitol test Reply
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A new test for canine intestinal mucosa permeability
Results The least squares means of mannitol proportion (excreted/ingested ± SE) was 15.6 % (± 2.0), 11.0 % (± 2.1) and 5.5 % (± 2.1) for urine sampled 2, 4 and 6 h after ingestion (p<0.0001). Hence, the majority of mannitol absorption and secretion representing upper gastrointestinal leakage was completed by 4 h. Riboflavin followed a similar temporal profile, defining 4 h as a cutoff for upper...
متن کاملIntestinal permeability in the newborn.
Passive intestinal permeability in 33 newborn babies was studied using feeds containing lactulose and mannitol. Each marker is thought to pass across the gut wall by a different route; lactulose by a paracellular and mannitol by a transcellular pathway. Neither is metabolised and both are wholly and solely excreted by the kidney; urinary recovery is a measure of the intestinal uptake. Babies bo...
متن کاملIntestinal permeability in strongyloidiasis.
The objective of the present study was to assess intestinal permeability in patients with infection caused by Strongyloides stercoralis. Twenty-six patients (16 women and 10 men), mean age 45.9, with a diagnosis of strongyloidiasis were evaluated. For comparison, 25 healthy volunteers (18 women and 7 men), mean age 44.9, without digestive disorders or intestinal parasites served as normal contr...
متن کاملPermeability of Intestinal Capillaries
The pathway followed by macromolecules across the wall of visceral capillaries has been studied by using a set of tracers of graded sizes, ranging in diameter from 100 A (ferritin) to 300 A (glycogen). Polysaccharide particles, i.e. dextran 75 (mol wt approximately 75,000; diam approximately 125 A), dextran 250 (mol wt 250,000; diam approximately 225 A), shellfish glycogen (diam approximately 2...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Gut
سال: 2001
ISSN: 0017-5749
DOI: 10.1136/gut.49.2.312